When I look back to the days when I used to be in elementary and through high school, the focus of education was to help kids learn new subjects, hone new skills, develop the ability to articulate thoughts, understand what great achievers did in the past and encourage the creativity to build a more analytical mind. Social interaction with other friends was part of the entire school life.
It seems times have changed and it is surprising that law makers now want to decide what should be taught, which achiever or personality should be mentioned, how it should be mentioned and when this should be imparted as part of a text book.
Interestingly the government in California has already legalized and requires schools to teach about women, African Americans, Mexican Americans, entrepreneurs, Asian Americans, European Americans, American Indians and labor. The Legislature over the years also has prescribed specific lessons about the Irish potato famine and the Holocaust, among other topics.
Guess now what is next? “The public protector and representatives” have passed a vote which now requires school to have history text books that talk about the achievements by gays. In short add lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people to the lengthy list of social and ethnic groups that schools must include in social studies lessons.
Where are we heading? What are we trying to teach our next generations?
The world has already been divided by caste, race, color of skin, religion and now sexual orientation is something that we want to divide the human race.
It is such an unfortunate thing that people want to be recognized by virtue of their sexual orientation and not based on their true contribution. Why is there a need to spell someone’s name in history and talk about their contribution based on their sexual orientation?
We already have enough issues with teen pregnancy, drugs and dropouts in schools. Why don’t we focus on improving the quality of education and help hone skills that will help them to be successful individuals in their later life.
Einstein would love to be known for his contribution and not for sexual orientation; Oscar Wilde would like to be known for his literature and not for anything else, Socrates would always be known as the famous Greek Philosopher but anything else.
What are we heading to? Is this global development? Is this what we want our kids and future generations to learn rather than focusing on the great contributions done by men and women of this world. On one hand we all think of one human race and all are same, yet we tend to break ourselves further based on attribute that has nothing to do.